Nuclear
Control Institute Committee
to Bridge the Gap
WASHINGTONThe nations 103 nuclear power reactors are vulnerable to
attack by terrorists, and the Nuclear Regulatory Commission and other government
entities have failed to move decisively to impose the further security measures
that are needed to prevent a successful attack and avert catastrophic
radiological consequences.
This was the warning issued today by two watchdog organizations that have
made many attempts over the past 17 years to convince the NRC and commercial
nuclear plant operators to upgrade their defenses against assaults by terrorist
organizations. In their
letter, the Washington-based Nuclear Control Institute and the Los Angeles-based
Committee to Bridge the Gap released a recent exchange of letters with NRC
Chairman Richard A. Meserve. The two organizations cited the extraordinary
and unprecedented threat that now exists inside the United States in the wake of
the attacks on the World Trade Center and the Pentagon. They laid out
specific proposals for denying terrorists the opportunity to destroy nuclear
power plants. These
proposals include immediate use of National Guard troops to deter attacks from
land and water, prompt deployment of advanced anti-aircraft weapons to defeat
suicidal attacks from the air, and a thorough re-vetting of all plant employees
and contractors to protect against sabotage by insiders. In addition, the groups called on the NRC to significantly
upgrade its security regulations to protect against the larger numbers and the
greater sophistication of attackers posed by the new terrorist threat. In a brief
response to the specific proposals, Meserve stated only that the Commission
is evaluating current requirements and statutory authority relating to acts or
threats of terrorism, including but not limited to those that you presented in
your letter. This is a
familiar refrain, and we do not have the luxury of time to allow the NRC and
other federal agencies to engage in a prolonged bureaucratic review process,
said Paul Leventhal, president of NCI, at a press conference in Washington.
Iran threatened attacks against U.S. reactors as early as 1987, but
recent trial testimony has revealed that bin Ladens training camps are
offering instruction in urban warfare against enemies
installations including power plants. It is prudent to assume, especially
after the horrific, highly coordinated attacks of September 11, that bin
Ladens soldiers have done their homework and are fully capable to attack
nuclear plants for maximum effect. Daniel
Hirsch, president of the Committee to Bridge the Gap, underscored the immediate
danger by noting that nearly half of the plants tested in NRC-supervised
security exercises have failed to repel mock terrorist attacks. These
exercises involve small numbers of simulated attackers compared with the large
cell of terrorists now understood to have waged the four sophisticated attacks
of September 11. The NRCs mock
terrorist exercises severely limit the tactics, weapons and explosives used by
the adversary, yet in almost half the tests they reached and simulated
destruction of safety systems that in real attacks could have caused severe core
damage, meltdown and catastrophic radioactive releases. Now in response to
operator complaints, the NRC is actually preparing to shift responsibility for
supervising these exercises to the operators themselves. Current events clearly show that nuclear power plant security
is too important to be left to industry self-assessment. Dr.
Edwin Lyman, a physicist and NCIs scientific director, pointed out that a
direct, high-speed hit by a large commercial passenger jet would in fact have
a high likelihood a penetrating a containment building that houses a power
reactor. Following such an
assault, he said, the possibility of an unmitigated loss-of-coolant
accident and significant release of radiation into the environment is a very
real one. Such a release,
whether caused by an air strike, or by a ground or water assault, or by insider
sabotage could result in tens of thousands of cancer deaths downwind of the
plant. A number of these plants are
located near large cities, he noted. In
making their presentations, the organizations acknowledged that they have long
been troubled by the dilemma of speaking about the present vulnerability of
nuclear power plants. We have
tried to work quietly for a decade and a half in a largely unsuccessful attempt
to get the NRC to upgrade reactor security. said Leventhal.
Our principal success came in 1994 when the NRC agreed to require
nuclear plant operators to erect barriers and establish setback distances to
protect against truck-bomb attacks. But
this reform came only after the lesson of the bombing of the World Trade Center
the year before, and the NRC has refused our appeals to upgrade protection to
defend against the much larger bombs used by terrorists since. Hirsch said
that the horrendous attacks of September 11 have now made NRC foot dragging
intolerable. The new threat
should now be evident to all, and the country can afford to wait no longer,
he said. The vulnerabilities at these plants can and must be closed, now.
The American people have a right to know the dangers and to demand the
prompt corrective actions that we propose to protect nuclear power plants from
terrorist attacks and the unthinkable consequences that could follow. Copies of the letter to Meserve were sent to the governors of the 32
states where nuclear power plants are located and to several Federal agencies.
Some members of Congress, including Rep. Edward Markey (D-Mass.) who sent
his own letter to Meserve, are actively monitoring the NRCs role in
protecting nuclear power plants against the heightened terrorist threat. |