|
 |
U.S. takes claim
of `dirty bomb' seriously
By Michael Kilian, Washington Bureau. Tribune news services
contributed to this report Published April 24,
2002
WASHINGTON -- Despite
deep skepticism about the credibility of captured Al Qaeda leader Abu
Zubaydah, the U.S. intelligence community is taking seriously his claim
that his organization has the capability of building a radioactive "dirty
bomb," a U.S. official said Tuesday.
American intelligence agents
have undertaken a widespread search for evidence to corroborate the
statement made to U.S. interrogators in an undisclosed location where the
Pakistani militant has been held since his arrest last month, the official
said.
"The
United States remains a nation that is at war," said White House spokesman
Ari Fleischer at his daily briefing Tuesday. "On the one hand, we have
been very fortunate that there has been a real lull, that there have been
no incidents taking places in the United States. ... But no one should be
under any illusions. We have an enemy that is trying to hit us and strike
us."
Zubaydah, who is believed to have been Osama bin Laden's chief
of operations, said Al Qaeda had given high priority to making such a bomb
and using it against important targets in the U.S.
"The question of
whether or not they have acquired a dirty bomb ... is something that we
have previously identified as something we know they wanted to do,"
Fleischer said.
Although Zubaydah may be practicing psychological
warfare, the threat has to be taken seriously because of the ease with
which such a bomb can be constructed and detonated, the U.S. government
official said.
"He has a reputation for being much less than
truthful," this official said. "You can launch a terrorist attack just by
claiming something and causing panic. This kind of disinformation may be
what he's trying to do.
"But we're taking this very seriously. It
doesn't take much skill to make one of those things."
Unlike the
far more complicated and dangerous atomic bomb, which derives its enormous
destructive power from initiating an explosive nuclear chain reaction, a
dirty bomb can be made by simply combining radioactive material with
explosives.
"The idea is to spread radioactive elements over a wide
area," said Peter Stockton, former special assistant to the energy
secretary for nuclear security. "You can use radioactive waste from
medical labs. You simply fill the material with C4 explosive and set it
off in a crowded place."
Stockton, a senior investigator for the
Project on Government Oversight watchdog group in Washington, said an
additional concern is lax security at government nuclear weapons labs at
Los Alamos, N.M., and elsewhere.
In a report issued last fall, the
group cited exercises in which mock terrorist teams provided by the U.S.
military were able to penetrate defenses at Los Alamos.
He said
there is also a problem with what the Energy Department describes as
"inventory differences" in which U.S. nuclear labs have been unable to
account for missing radioactive matter.
However, in a recent speech
in Washington, Los Alamos National Laboratory Director Donald Cobb said
the nation's nuclear weapons laboratories are secure.
Whatever the
amount or source of radioactive matter, the primary concern about dirty
bombs is not simply the casualties at the scene, which would be
comparatively light, but the widespread panic and fear.
An attack
would be "not very effective as a means of causing fatalities," Richard
Meserve, chairman of the federal Nuclear Regulatory Commission, told a
Senate Foreign Relations subcommittee last month. "But it could have a
psycho-social effect, and terrorists' greatest weapon is
fear."
Cobb told the committee that Russia is working to keep tight
control of its nuclear weapons but that other sources of radioactive
matter were far more accessible.
"Nuclear weapons and weapon-usable
materials tend to be focused in military applications under tight
government oversight," he said. "Radiological sources are more widespread
and have fewer controls."
Zubaydah had earlier warned that Al Qaeda
had targeted banks in the northeastern United States for terrorist attack,
which prompted an FBI alert last week.
Fleischer was asked Tuesday
whether the White House considered Zubaydah to be credible.
"Those
are judgments that intelligence experts make based on not only what he
says but on other pieces of information that will corroborate
information," Fleischer said. "Obviously, his capture is a significant
asset to the United States government."
Copyright 2002, Chicago Tribune
|