New York Times New York Region The New York Times
Home
Job Market
Real Estate
Automobiles
News
International
National
Nation Challenged
Politics
Business
Technology
Science
Health
Sports
New York Region
- The City
- Columns
Education
Weather
Obituaries
NYT Front Page
Corrections
Opinion
Editorials/Op-Ed
Readers' Opinions


Features
Arts
Books
Movies
Travel
Dining & Wine
Home & Garden
Fashion & Style
New York Today
Crossword/Games
Cartoons
Magazine
Week in Review
Photos
College
Learning Network
Services
Archive
Classifieds
Theater Tickets
NYT Mobile
NYT Store
E-Cards & More
About NYTDigital
Jobs at NYTDigital
Online Media Kit
Our Advertisers
Your Profile
Your Profile
E-Mail Preferences
News Tracker
Premium Account
Site Help
Newspaper
  Home Delivery
Customer Service
Electronic Edition
Media Kit
Text Version
TipsGo to Advanced Search
Search Options divide
go to Member Center Log Out
  Welcome, boyandob
E-Mail This Article Printer-Friendly Format
Most E-Mailed Articles


May 1, 2002

At Indian Pt. Hearing, Crowds, Speeches, but Not Much Listening

By WINNIE HU

WHITE PLAINS, April 30 The battle lines were clearly drawn tonight over the Indian Point nuclear power plant as its critics and defenders sparred over its fate before county legislators.

In front at the meeting at the Westchester County Center, the critics wore red shirts and jackets and waved red paper, all to call attention to the plant's safety lapses. In the back, plant workers and others pinned on Indian Point buttons and displayed signs and small American flags.

Neither side seemed willing to listen to the other, and after about 45 minutes of impassioned speeches punctuated occasionally by jeers nearly all of the plant workers walked out in anger and frustration.

"We don't think it's a fair hearing," said Zvi Eisenberg, 52, a systems engineer at the plant.

More than 350 people attended the meeting, held by Westchester legislators to address safety concerns about the plant's two working reactors in Buchanan, about 40 miles north of Midtown Manhattan. In recent months, a growing number of state and local politicians, environmental groups and residents have demanded the decommissioning of Indian Point.

Tonight's meeting was called after such a large crowd jammed into a March 21 meeting that about 150 people who signed up to speak were not given a chance. Only those people were allowed to take the floor tonight, drawing complaints from Indian Point workers and others who also wanted to be heard.


Topics

 Alerts
Environment
Manhattan (NYC)
Nuclear Regulatory Commission
Create Your Own | Manage Alerts
Take a Tour
Sign Up for Newsletters

NYT Guide to Hotels in New York City

Buy this book for $14.95 .

Westchester legislators are considering two resolutions about Indian Point, including one that calls for decommissioning it and, if possible, converting it to natural gas or alternative-fuel operation. The other resolution urges an evaluation of Indian Point's emergency plan by an independent group outside the government. The resolutions could be voted on as early as next month.

Legislator Michael B. Kaplowitz, who proposed the resolution to decommission Indian Point, said that after hearing the public comments, he was "as fervent as ever."

But even if county legislators adopt a resolution calling for the closing of Indian Point, it would be largely symbolic. Though it would be a first for Westchester, the Rockland County Legislature and many towns, villages and school boards in both counties have passed similar resolutions, with little effect.

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission, the federal agency that oversees Indian Point, has approved its operations.

The Entergy Corporation, which owns Indian Point, has maintained that its operations are safe, and plant workers and others have increasingly mobilized to counter growing opposition to the plant.


Home | Back to New York Region | Search | Help Back to Top

E-Mail This Article Printer-Friendly Format
Most E-Mailed Articles


Wake up to the world with home delivery of The New York Times newspaper. Click Here for 50% off.


Copyright 2002 The New York Times Company | Privacy Information