Home
   Weather
   Sports
   Opinion
   Obituaries
   Special Sections
   Forums
   Archive
   Search
   Front Page
   Subscription
     Services
   @ugusta Help


   City Guide
   Classifieds
   Employment
   Coupons
   Autos
   Real Estate
   Yellow Pages
   Maps
   Directions


   Applause
   Dining
   Movies
   Travel
   Television
   Lottery
   Horoscopes


   Net Music
   Quick Cooking
   Remote
   Your Health
   Fitness Files
   JobSmart
   Food & Recipes
   Newspapers
    in Education


   Xtreme
   Citizen Activist
   Augusta Golf
   Augusta
     Magazine
   Business
     Chronicle


   F.A.Q.
   Advertise
   Chronicle Staff
   Chronicle Jobs
   Internet Service


Breaking News:
 Two Firemen Wounded in Baltimore
 Einhorn Extradited to US for Trial
 U.S. Suspends Univ. Research Funding
 Female Serial Killer Seeks Execution
 Union: Levy Search Hurts Other Cases


Nuclear disposal deal struck

Web posted Sep. 02 at 01:16 AM

 Have a thought? Go to the @ugusta Forums.

By Brandon Haddock
Staff Writer

U.S. negotiators have widened a path for proposed plutonium-processing plants at Savannah River Site.

Vice President Al Gore signed an agreement Friday with Russia under which each nation would dispose of 55 tons of its surplus plutonium. To fulfill U.S. obligations, the Department of Energy plans to build three plants at SRS to treat plutonium and prepare it for disposal.

Site supporters have pushed for the plants, which would cost about $1.4 billion and create hundreds of long-term jobs at the federal nuclear-weapons site.

``We're excited about the signing,'' said Don Blackmon, project development and outreach manager for Duke COGEMA Stone & Webster, the firm that is designing one of the proposed SRS plants.

``Assuming that it has in it what we expect it to have in it, then we think that's great,'' Mr. Blackmon said of the accord. ``Congress is looking for that agreement to be signed to ensure that the program continues on course.''

But some observers did not share such optimism. The agreement relies on the recycling of some plutonium into nuclear-reactor fuel, which many activists have called a costly and dangerous exercise.

Plutonium can cause cancer if even tiny amounts of the metal are inhaled.

The accord also fails to cement safety standards, and resolve liability issues, at proposed plutonium-treatment plants in Russia, said Tom Clements, executive director at the Nuclear Control Institute in Washington.

``We think there should be more agreement on them at this point, instead of putting them off into the future,'' Mr. Clements said Friday during a telephone interview. ``The whole program will get rolling without these issues being finalized.

``To proceed without having worked out these difficult points is not necessarily a prudent way to proceed on such a serious matter.''

The plan also faces financial hurdles. Russia cannot afford to fund its own plutonium plants. The United States has pledged up to $200 million to help Russia pay for its program, but other nations have not been so forthcoming.

At July's summit of the ``Group of Eight'' - Great Britain, Canada, Japan, Germany, Italy, France, Russia and the United States - foreign leaders postponed until next year a decision about providing international funding to Russia's plutonium program.

``It will be problematic,'' Mr. Clements said of the funding issue. ``I think that in large part, the agreement is window dressing and they will not be able to carry out this program without these other things.''

Reach Brandon Haddock at (706) 823-3409.


[Past Articles]


 

  All contents ©copyright The Augusta Chronicle. Online since 1996. All contents subject to our privacy policy. Comments or questions? Contact the webmasters.