An expected U.S.-Russia summit
agreement to use nearly 70 tons of U.S. and Russian warhead plutonium as fuel
in nuclear-power plants would cost upwards of $6 billion, invite nuclear
proliferation, and pose grave safety risks, according to the Nuclear Control
Institute (NCI), a non-proliferation research and advocacy center. The agreement, likely to be signed by
Presidents Clinton and Putin this weekend in Moscow, calls for each nation to
use 34 tons of weapons-grade plutonium as fuel in nuclear power plants over the
next 25 years rather than dispose of it directly as waste.
This agreement is a commercial enterprise disguised
as disarmament, said NCI President Paul Leventhal. The Russians and plutonium advocates worldwide view it as a
shortcut to reviving plutonium fuel programs, and introducing this dangerous
fuel into the U.S. nuclear power sector after it was abandoned two decades
ago. This program could become a model
for other nations that covet plutonium for civilian applications that can
easily turn military.
"The nuclear-terrorism risks of distributing
plutonium fuel to reactors in Russia at a time of political and economic
instability should be obvious, added Leventhal. The cost will not be $6 billion, as currently estimated, but
tens of billions of dollars tossed down a nuclear black hole because Russia's
reactors will have to be refurbished and its nuclear industry fully subsidized
to take on the task.
"With strong technical support, directly
disposing of weapons plutonium by immobilizing it in highly radioactive waste
would be much faster, cheaper and safer than using it as fuel in reactors,
noted NCI Research Director Steven Dolley. The agreement gives lip service to
the waste approach as a second option and provides for minimal amounts of
impure plutonium to be disposed of as waste.
But it is clear that the plutonium-fuel approach is the one favored by
powerful industrial interests in both nations, as well as in Europe and Japan.
Reactor fuel made out of warhead
plutonium has never been used on a commercial scale, and its behavior in
reactors has not been tested. Use of
plutonium fuel will greatly increase the risk to the public from a serious
nuclear accident, noted Dr. Edwin Lyman, NCI Scientific Director. Dr. Lyman recently completed an analysis
that predicts the U.S.-Russian plan would increase the number of cancer
fatalities resulting from a severe reactor accident by 25 percent. It is not clear who would be liable, or
whether any compensation would be provided, if such an accident occurred. Liability for such accidents in Russia is
still in dispute between U.S. and Russian negotiators.
Further information on the risks
of plutonium fuel are available on NCIs website at http://www.nci.org/nci-wpu.htm. The following documents provide useful
overviews: http://www.nci.org/e/el-russiamox.htm,
http://www.nci.org/b/bas97.htm, http://www.nci.org/s/sp31298.htm, http://www.nci.org/e/el62899.htm,
http://www.nci.org/l/l122096.htm, http://www.nci.org/n/nci-wpu-art-nyt1.htm